Explanation
A. (Correct Response) This principle aligns with Tatiana's decision not to replace Ted. Despite Ted's reduced hours, he makes irreplaceable contributions that may not be replicated by another employee. According to this principle, an employee should only be replaced if it is known that their work can be done equally well by someone else. Tatiana's choice reflects this principle, as she evidently believes that Ted's unique contributions warrant his continued employment despite his shortcomings.
B. While equitable compensation is important, it does not directly address the matter of replacing an employee based on their unique contributions versus hours worked.
C. The authority to decide on an employee’s replacement is not at issue in Tatiana's decision-making process.
D. The idea of joint responsibility does not inform Tatiana's decision regarding whether Ted's unique contributions can be replaced.
E. The relationship between an employee's contributions and their time on the job is not the focus of Tatiana's decision, which is based more on the irreplaceability of Ted's contributions than on the hours he works.
Tatiana's decision is most directly justified by the principle in option A. Since Ted offers something uniquely valuable, Tatiana's reluctance to replace him is based on the uncertainty that another employee could fill his role with equal effectiveness.