top of page

LSAT Preptest 150, Section 1, Question 8

Passage 2: Eyewitness Interviews

Explanation

A. While the passage does discuss psychological research, the reference to "alibis" is not specifically to highlight a positive contribution but rather to set the context for police interviews.


B. The term "alibis" is not used to exemplify the type of information sought from suspects; instead, it is part of the broader context of the type of information that can be gathered through interviews. Moreover, the passage is not concerned with the types of information that can be gathered, therefore there is no need to exemplify it. The passage is focused on interview techniques.


C. (Correct Response) "Alibis" are mentioned as an example of the practical applications of effective interview procedures, which could include verifying the statements given by individuals during a police investigation.


D. There is no indication in the reference to "alibis" that contrasts the concerns of police officers with psychologists; rather, it is about the utility of interview procedures.


E. The complexity of the cognitive interview is not the focus in the mention of "alibis," which are more about the outcomes of the interview process rather than the process itself.

The reference to "alibis" at the beginning of the passage serves to contextualize the discussion around effective interview techniques, suggesting practical uses for such methods in police work, particularly how they can aid in confirming or disconfirming statements made by individuals, which ties into the broader topic of interview effectiveness.

bottom of page